Mind Control Security Awareness

Tuesday, April 03, 2012

Pete Herzog

1789975b05c7c71e14278df690cabf26

I live in the past. Literally. What I know as "now" really happened at least 80 milliseconds ago. Because that's the minimum time it took for me to get the sensory input of the world around me, process it, decide on it, and slip it up into conscious thought so I'm aware of it. So I'm always living a little bit in the past.

Sometimes it can take a second or longer. Some brain activity has been shown processing input sometimes up to a second and a half before our minds let us be consciously aware of it. Which is different than some lower forms of animals, like insects and arachnids which have much shorter neuro-pathways and lack the higher cognitive function which we have. They're all instinct, so to speak. So they can react much quicker. I already noticed how flies can make me feel like I'm moving in slow motion when I try to swat them.

Previously, I also wondered why it seemed like spiders can sense the future and react before I even decided to brush them off their webs. If their signal processing to reaction time is about 20ms then they're still living at least 60ms ahead of me in the future. The movement of my own hand is something relayed back to my mind 60ms later than it is to them. And when it comes to a slap, the actual swing from start to finish may be about 200ms. So they saw the slap come and go long before the pain registered in my hand.

Overall, living 80ms in the past is not so bad. Especially since most everyone other healthy human is dealing with at least that much. I think what bothers me more is that my decisions are made for me before I am aware of them. That takes a lot more getting used to. The idea that I'm just a set of sensors for my mind kinda bugs me. And that my mind runs on a complex and immensely huge set of rules, often poorly indexed and sometimes contradictory, based on that sensory input all these years starting with my prenatal voyage.

Am I just the life support system for my mind? Is this me thinking there is no free will? Or is this me thinking that I am a unique and specially fitted illusion my mind made for me based on all the paths I crossed in my life? I mean really, if we gave as many sensors and sets of rules as we have to any robot for a few years it also would crush any Turing test too.

I'm not completely surprised that my mind takes over so many things subconsciously. After all, I'm completely aware that my heart beats on its own without me needing to consciously will it to. And while it's beating, I can walk stairs, a fairly complex, mathematical task if you needed to calculate it, while also talking and chewing gum. Sometimes I drive somewhere routine, like an office, a store, a school, and get there to realize I don't recall even driving there. So I know my mind is really in the driver's seat. I guess I just never realized how much until I was faced with the fact that it made decisions those 80ms before I knew that it did.

So my mind is made up before I know it's made up. This does explain why I make so many of the same stupid mistakes again and again. And no wonder it's so hard to break bad habits. No wonder they say that willpower is a muscle that needs to be exercised - because willpower is just the act of me adding more rules to my brain to outweigh the existing rules like some sort of Bayesian filter. So no wonder it's hard.

Rewriting our rules takes energy, maybe too much energy, which might explain why people need to be drastically reminded, or highly driven (or not to rule out psycho-actively drugged, deeply hypnotized, Zen meditationed) to make themselves change. For many, even dire health consequences is not enough to make changes because their original rule set with its Bayesian filters have become too heavily weighted against even the biggest rule of all: survival. So we need some kind of low-level formatting for our minds when our rules become dangerous to ourselves. Prescribed and supervised, perhaps.

But even if I can will myself to change and I give it all the effort I can, I know that sometimes, somehow, I'll stumble. That's how I can fall for phishing attacks, get persuaded into buying something that might not be what I really wanted, and it's how I might get influenced to make a decision that I'd later regret. It's this something that can happen where an old, contradictory rule gets evoked instead of the new one I just went through the trouble of making. These prompts most often trigger us to just react especially when we're feeling particularly stressed. That's when my mind really likes to fly solo. Part of the problem is that emotions and things which tie us to memories also tie us to old rules.

People can change easier when memories tied to the relevant parts of their past fade. And maybe there's something to it that people with better memories have a harder time changing themselves. However, I do know that being aware of my prompts, even the generic ones that we as humans all seem to share, is enough to make me stop reacting to one immediately. So then when I'm being prompted I get a feeling like when something shiny catches my eye. That stops me and makes me rethink how I should react. That 80ms pause is the moment I need to stop going on autopilot and get my decision into conscious thought. And from advertising to social interactions to political speeches, I noticed that I'm getting prompted all the time. It does make me wonder how much of my life would have been better had I not spent it on mental cruise control.

But this is all in the past now. It all is anyway. All I can do is try to keep on top of the kind of sensory input I'm getting. It's all any of us could do. ISECOM has been teaching a SmarterSaferBetter seminar teaches you to actively keep on re-filtering. Doing it right by being alerted to prompts is the best way to keep your guard up when it needs to be because honestly, actively filtering your world all the time is truly exhausting. And being tired is when we make more mistakes. We really do have only so much attention to give. But at the very least, we can learn to be aware of what our rules are and how our rules want us to act and react.

One huge benefit beyond the increased security and safety we get from this awareness is how it helps us figure out why other people do the things they do. With this I can easily see that they are the results of their own huge amount of sensory input and from that, a huge number of complex rules. So at the very least, it will bring me more understanding about the world I live in and the people I share it with. And that brings security with it as well.

For more information on the ISECOM project for correcting human vulnerabilities, visit SmarterSaferBetter. (This article tweaked from where it originally appeared in Cowbird.)

Possibly Related Articles:
12158
Security Awareness
Information Security
Security Awareness Methodologies Vulnerabilities Training Security Information Security Psychology Human Factor SmarterSaferBetter
Post Rating I Like this!
Default-avatar
Massimiliano Minniti Thanks Peter for your article, I enjoyed the differnet way of analyzing the human mindset and the reaction to the of life solicitations also taking a cue from the animal world
1333486822
09dae715e355968a0e90ebddf038ad56
Quintius Walker I consider it a blessing to listen to the words of a scientist.Thank you for posting this article, Mr. Herzog. You mentioned Zen; well, outside of Zen I can't recall anyone writing a post that renders the reader deeper into the present moment line after line as this one has. The part about memories, and people changing with ease when letting go is certainly a spiritual/psychological law observed throughout the history of mankind-and hopefully, a law that one realizes when they look at themselves in the mirror. This was a brilliant post, Mr. Herzog. Thanks.
1333493531
1789975b05c7c71e14278df690cabf26
Pete Herzog Hi Massimiliano and Quintius! Thanks both for your kind and well-received comments! Just yesterday I came across an article about how various animals and humans all living in the same ecosystem all may sense their environment differently (and at different speeds) in which case they all live in different worlds despite it being the same place. Made me think about when I first used an ultraviolet camera and saw for the first time that daisies have spots. Some birds and insects see ultraviolet and for them the daisy has always been the uniquely polka-dotted flower. But for me, previously, a field of daisies has always been homogenous white petals with a yellow center. We do live in the same world but in many ways we don't. I'm sure there's a Zen in there too somewhere....
1334048935
Default-avatar
Massimiliano Minniti We (humans, animals, insects and life forms in general) live in the same We (humans, animals, insects and life forms in general) live in the same world, but we feel\see only some different aspects of the same world. But the partial of the world consist the summation of what it perceives each single form of life.
Also we should consider the different radiations of the each item of the universe that it did not perceive by life forms, that we obviously know now.
1334052629
The views expressed in this post are the opinions of the Infosec Island member that posted this content. Infosec Island is not responsible for the content or messaging of this post.

Unauthorized reproduction of this article (in part or in whole) is prohibited without the express written permission of Infosec Island and the Infosec Island member that posted this content--this includes using our RSS feed for any purpose other than personal use.