Why Perform FCPA Due Diligence?

Friday, July 15, 2011

Thomas Fox

59d9b46aa00c70238bb89056cfeb96c0

So what are Red Flags and where do they appear? What level of due diligence does your company require for an entity based in the United States?

How often during the pendency of a transaction or business relationship should your company update its due diligence?

These questions and others were brought up in a recent article in the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) about a civil-racketeering lawsuit by the government of Ukraine against Olden Group, an Oregon based company. In the June 13, 2011 edition of the WSJ was an article by Dionne Searcy entitled, “Court Orders US Firm to Pay Ukraine”.

The article details a lawsuit which stemmed from an investigation, ordered by the President of the Ukraine, into medical supplies purchased by the government administration which preceded the most current administration.

The investigation was assisted by the US Company Kroll Inc., which issued a report on Olden Group. In its report, Kroll noted that Olden was tied to a “web of offshore companies registered in the US and tied Olden to past fraudulent schemes.”

The Kroll Report and other information led the Ukrainian government to file the lawsuit. The Ukraine lawsuit alleged that Olden entered into sham contracts with a Ukrainian firm named Interfarm LLC to submit “phony customs declarations” which misstated prices that the Ukrainian government paid for vaccines. These overcharged monies were then laundered through both US and Latvian banks. These monies have disappeared.

As reported in the WSJ, based upon corporate records obtained from the state of Oregon, Olden Group is owned by two separate companies. The first is named Worldwide Management and has an address which is a post office box in Belize.

The second is an entity named International United Holding AG and is based in Niue, an island in the South Pacific. Further these two companies are shareholders of numerous companies owned by two individuals, Charles Mathias and W. Rick Fletcher, who were reported in WSJ article to be “shareholders in numerous companies incorporated in Oregon.”

When reached by the WSJ for comment, Mr. Mathias related that he has “registered numerous firms on behalf of several Eastern European organizations.” State of Oregon records revealed that Mr. Mathias had registered about 2,762 companies in Oregon.

The WSJ article also noted that one of the firms related to the Olden Group was named in the US Department of Justice’s (DOJ) bribery and corruption case against Daimler. This allegation involved one of the 2,762 companies which Mr. Mathias had incorporated in Oregon, United Petrol Group.

It was alleged by the DOJ to be a part of Daimler’s corrupt acts to bribe certain Latvian government officials to obtain contracts. Lastly another entity formed by Mr. Mathias, Ronberg Gruppe, was placed on the World Bank blacklist in September 2010 for having “engaged in fraudulent practices relating to a [World Bank] project in Afghanistan.

I have set out this rather detailed description of the WSJ article to illustrate, once again, the need for continued vigilance throughout the due diligence process. Simply because your agent/vendor/business relationship is located in the United States, does not mean that you can automatically limit your due diligence inquiry to a Level One search.

You must also be vigilant in obtaining related party information on the entity with which you are doing business with and obtain a list of the principles and check on them as well. The experience of the Ukraine government and the information from the Wall Street Journal article clearly demonstrates the pitfalls of failing to do so.

This publication contains general information only and is based on the experiences and research of the author. The author is not, by means of this publication, rendering business, legal advice, or other professional advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such legal advice or services, nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business, you should consult a qualified legal advisor. The author, his affiliates, and related entities shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by any person or entity that relies on this publication. The Author gives his permission to link, post, distribute, or reference this article for any lawful purpose, provided attribution is made to the author. The author can be reached at tfox@tfoxlaw.com.

Cross-posted from Tom Fox Law

Possibly Related Articles:
5958
General
General Legal
Legal Compliance Enterprise Security Due Diligence FCPA DOJ
Post Rating I Like this!
The views expressed in this post are the opinions of the Infosec Island member that posted this content. Infosec Island is not responsible for the content or messaging of this post.

Unauthorized reproduction of this article (in part or in whole) is prohibited without the express written permission of Infosec Island and the Infosec Island member that posted this content--this includes using our RSS feed for any purpose other than personal use.